This week in class, we had a symposium. During the symposium
on Wednesday, the button scenario was brought up again. This time, we had to
approach the situation in the way Kant or Mill would. Mill and the Utilitarian philosophy would say that no one in that situation should press the button. This
decision is based on the Greatest Happiness Principle. By not pressing the button,
you will cause the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of
people. I believe that the decision not to press the button is the obvious
choice. In the situation, I am thinking rationally, however, there is no guarantee
that everyone else in the room and the next room is thinking rationally. Thus, you
have to keep in mind that there may be at least one person in each room that is
thinking irrationally and is for pushing the button and will do so if no one
stops them. It seems like a no brainer to some not to press the button on the
sure fact that everyone lives if no one presses the button. Dr. J brought up a
good point noting the fact that historically speaking, in a serious life or
death situation people do not tend the think rationally and logically. Because
of this historical trend, I believe, once aware, more and more people will
agree to press the button in both rooms. I say this because at first, I was on
the side not to press the button, but after Dr. J brought the fact up, I, and
others began to contemplate my decision. In this situation, I believe that the
irrational thinking people could possibly convince the rational people to agree
with them. I say this because there are so many “what ifs” in this scenario and
when brought to the table will make everyone think about their decision. But
then again while everyone is debating whether or not to push the button, someone
will slip by unnoticed and press the button and it would be all over, or not,
depending on if the person was in your room or not.
No comments:
Post a Comment